Omnipotence? Would it be possible?

Omnipotence generates an ostensible paradox due to our limited knowledge, where it appears that the logic of juxtapositional contraposition, in spite of its justification by the standard truth tables for propositional logic, becomes deductively invalid via a semantic twist of fate. Say that entity X is defined as being "omnipotent". Can X create a rock too heavy for X to lift? If yes, then X is not omnipotent. If no then X is also not omnipotent. But when omnipotence is defined as being truly transcendental in nature, that is to say, omnipotence is the ability to transcend any logical framework, then the paradox loses its bite. Of course transcendental arguments then lose coherence because "anything goes".

In order to quantify and qualify transcendence it consequently becomes necessary to stratify transcendence/omnipotence as a system of sequentially related meta logical variables in arbitrary logical order. AKA TIME. The exact relationships need not be precisely defined as long as it is required as a necessary condition that the relands are systematically and comprehensively ordered, even though the complete network is not tabulated down to the last quanta of information.

So we see that the omnipotent entity X, becomes a transcendent quantum superposition of both lifting the rock and not lifting the rock and all possible states in between, and due to its own omnipotence, the being X, can prevent itself from being observed. Thus it can transcend logic and still be logically consistent. Globally transcendent and locally parameterized via the constraints of its own stratified logical framework.